CS / EN

Civil claim filing in the Czech Republic: who acts for the party

A foreign parent company facing civil claim filing in the Czech Republic usually asks one question first: who actually acts for the party in litigation. Its own legal team drafts a claim and expects to send it to the Czech court directly. That is not how Czech civil procedure works, and the gap between the two systems costs time exactly when time is short.

A civil claim before a Czech court is filed by the party itself or by an advocate holding a power of attorney; in-house counsel abroad cannot lodge it directly. The filing follows Czech civil procedure, is made to the court with jurisdiction, and runs in Czech – which is why who acts for the party, and in what language, is settled before the claim is drafted, not after.

What follows sets out who may act, the route and the language requirement, what the filing must contain, and the point at which representation becomes necessary rather than optional.

Who may act for the party before a Czech court?

A party may act in person or through a representative. For a foreign company, acting in person means through its statutory body; its foreign in-house lawyers are not, by that status, entitled to appear before a Czech court. Representation is provided by a Czech-admitted advocate on a power of attorney, who signs and lodges the filing and conducts the correspondence that follows.

This is the gap that costs time: a foreign legal team drafts a claim to its own procedural template and expects to file it, then finds the matter has to be reworked to Czech civil procedure and lodged through an advocate. Settling representation first removes that round of rework.

A power of attorney that is clear on scope at the outset avoids a later challenge to the representative's authority mid-proceedings.

What is the route, and in what language?

The claim is filed with the court that has jurisdiction over the matter and the defendant, and the proceedings are conducted in Czech. Documents in another language are filed with a translation where the court requires it, and service on a defendant abroad follows the cross-border service rules rather than ordinary domestic service.

  • Foreign claimant, Czech defendant → advocate files on a power of attorney → to the court with jurisdiction over the defendant → within the limitation period for the claim
  • Documents in a foreign language → translation prepared where required → before the court will act on them
  • Defendant seated in another EU state → service through the cross-border service route → on the timeline that route fixes, not domestic service

A foreign parent reached a decision on the merits faster after instructing a Czech advocate at the outset and filing once, rather than lodging a claim built on its home procedure that had to be redrawn (autumn 2025). A limitation period that has run cannot be restored by refiling the same claim correctly later.

What must the filing contain?

  • the identification of the court, the claimant and the defendant from the register
  • a statement of the facts and the legal ground of the claim
  • the relief sought, stated precisely
  • the evidence relied on, attached rather than described
  • the power of attorney for the advocate, where one acts
  • an address for service, and a translation where the court requires one

What cannot be established from documents before filing: whether the defendant will contest jurisdiction, whether service abroad will complete on the expected timeline, and how the court will treat foreign-language evidence. These become known only once the claim is lodged and served.

Act, wait or stop: the decision point

Act where the limitation period is running and the facts are documented, because the filing, not correspondence, interrupts it and the first draft is best built to Czech procedure. Wait only where a contractual step – a required notice or negotiation – has to be completed before a claim is admissible. Stop and reconsider where a jurisdiction or arbitration clause points the matter away from the Czech courts entirely.

Frequently asked questions

Can our in-house lawyers file the claim themselves?

Foreign in-house counsel cannot lodge a claim directly before a Czech court. The party acts through its statutory body in person or, in practice, through a Czech-admitted advocate on a power of attorney, who conducts the proceedings in Czech.

In what language is the claim filed?

In Czech. Foreign-language documents are accompanied by a translation where the court requires it, and the need for translation is one of the reasons to settle representation before drafting rather than after.

How is a defendant abroad served?

Through the cross-border service route rather than ordinary domestic service, which runs on its own timeline. Building that time into the plan from the start avoids a deadline being missed while service is still in transit.

Does filing stop the limitation period?

Yes. It is the filing of the claim, not a reminder or a demand letter, that interrupts the limitation period. A period that has already run cannot be revived by filing correctly afterward.

LISTINA produces factual reports from documents and public registers. It does not provide legal advice and does not represent parties. Where a matter requires representation before a Czech court or authority, it is handled by a collaborating advocate.

Tereza Kolářová · LISTINA ·

Ask about your matter

Or write directly: info@listinafirm.com